"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
09/01/2018 at 09:15 • Filed to: None
0
10|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
09/01/2018 at 09:15 • Filed to: None | 0
| 10 |
Not my video.
Sovande
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
09/01/2018 at 09:18 |
|
That payback can be a real motherfucker.
xsnowpig
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
09/01/2018 at 09:19 |
|
Darwinism was so close on that one.
farscythe - makin da cawfee!
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
09/01/2018 at 09:24 |
|
hard to feel sorry for him...
McMike
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
09/01/2018 at 09:46 |
|
Too bad we missed the beginning of all this, there was rage before the camera car pulled in behind them.
And also the end, when the truck backed up to finish him off.
shop-teacher
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
09/01/2018 at 09:59 |
|
Play stupid games ....
marshknute
> McMike
09/01/2018 at 10:48 |
|
Rule #2: Double Tap
wafflesnfalafel
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
09/01/2018 at 11:04 |
|
something must have happened before the vid started to get that biker all hot headed and not thinking straight...
atfsgeoff
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
09/01/2018 at 14:00 |
|
Yes, another game of “Let’s provoke the person with a 5,000lb weapon into running me over.”
Should have just rolled on the throttle and left the truck alone.
Nom De Plume
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
09/01/2018 at 14:24 |
|
That ending was Jalopnik teaser image worthy.
ttyymmnn
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
09/01/2018 at 15:01 |
|
There are no winners here.